Branching Out is the free, quarterly, forest stewardship newsletter
published by Maryland
Cooperative Extension to provide current information to forest
landowners, natural resource professionals, and the public. The newsletter
has a simple 4-page format that provides an in-depth story on a selected
topics, along with a calendar of events, information on new resources,
and short stories of upcoming educational programs.
To view the Summer 1998 issue of Branching Out
in pdf/printable format, click
here.
What is Green Forest Certification?
Some forest products carry the label "Green". This means
they meet certain standards. But, what are those standards and does
"Green" appeal to consumers and benefit you, the producer?
Forest certification is an independent audit of forest practices.
It gives consumers information on the impact of managing and harvesting
forest products on the environment and assures the "chain of
custody" of the forest products from the forest to the store
shelf. In theory, some consumers will prefer products that are sustainably
harvested and managed and will pay a premium for certified products.
Three organizations have taken steps toward developing forest certification
programs: the Forest Stewardship Council, the National Forestry
Association, and the American Forest and Paper Association. Each
of these programs has unique concerns and limitations, but all must
answer to the free market.
Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)
The FSC is an international, independent, nonprofit, non-government
organization with strong environmental ties. Through its program
of Green Certification, it aims to set a worldwide, common set of
principles for certifying well-managed forests. FSC has accredited
several organizations to certify the management activities of landowners
and foresters.
Two of these groups are SmartWood and Scientific Certification
Systems. Together they have given green certification to 1.6 million
acres of forestland in the U.S. FSC=s standards work best in regions
with tree species that do not rely on intensive management for regeneration,
such as planting or clearcutting. The standards are not tied into
existing forest management programs such as Forest Stewardship and
Tree Farm.
The National Forestry Association (NFA)
A second program for certification, Green Tag ForestrySM, is now
being offered the NFA, an affiliate of the National Woodlands Owners
Association (NWOA), a national organization of nonindustrial private
woodland owners affiliated with state and county woodland owner
associations. Green Tag ForestrySM also relies on third party certification,
but is designed specifically for private forest landowners. To display
the Green Tag sign, forest owners must have implemented a detailed
forest management plan prepared by a registered consulting forester
who has training in certification procedures. The plan can build
on a Tree Farm or Forest Stewardship plan but will have more detail,
especially in timber harvesting procedures and recognition of natural
diversity components. The NFA intitiative ties into the existing
network of consulting foresters nationwide affiliated with the NWOA.
The American Forest & Paper Assn. (AF&PA)
The Sustainable Forestry Initiative, or SFI, is the mechanism AF&PA
is using to inform the public that its members are managing forests
and producing forest products in a sustainable manner. AF&PA
members constitute 90 percent of the industrial forestland in America.
While not called a certification program, SFI appears to be heading
in that direction. There presently is no third party verification
to support SFI=s forest management claims. Also, wood from nonindustrial
private forests (NIPF), creates a special problem because it constitutes
60 percent of the wood used by forest industries. There is nothing
in the SFI principles to encourage landowners to use a professional
forester when managing their resources. Currently, 80 percent of
the timber harvested by your fellow NIPF owners is conducted without
the advice of a professional forester. Therefore, AF&PA is,
in essence, relying on loggers to manage most of America=s non-industrial
private forestland.
Concerns with Certification
Significant questions are raised about the scientific underpinnings
of the principles used by the FSC. Under FSC principles, 1) no wood
resulting from the harvest of old-growth forests that then are planted,
and no wood from forest lands that are converted to non-forest uses
can be labeled "green"; 2) no wood from well developed
secondary forests that are planted can be labeled "green";
and 3) wood from plantations can be labeled only if the forest owner
recreates and manages for natural forest conditions on 5-10 percent
of the property.
FSC principles tend to be biased against regenerating commercially
viable shade-intolerant species such as oak, ash, and pine, that
rely on even-aged management practices. Many eastern forests are
in poor conditions from past cutting practices. If only uneven-aged
management is allowed, diameter-limit cutting or selective cutting
practices will be encouraged, which can result in removing just
the best trees and further degrading the forest. The push by FSC
to prohibit stands regenerated by planting and other intensive practices
can limit seriously the options for the small landowners that make
up the majority of Mid-Atlantic forestlands.
Opportunity to Comment
Currently, FSC is seeking to develop regional standards based on
its eleven principles and criteria for forest management. The draft
standards for the Appalachia regional (which includes Maryland)
are now available for public comment, even beyond the official July
1 deadline. The 25-pages of draft standards fail to provide any
connection with existing landowner assistance programs.
Landowners and forestry professionals are encouraged to review
this document on the Internet at www.maced.org/fsc/fsc.html. Click
on the icon for Adraft standards@ to find the 11 principles and
their contents. Send your comments ASAP to Mike Jenkins, Mountain
Association for Community Economic Development, 433 Chestnut Street,
Berea, Kentucky 40403; fax: 606- 986-1299; e-mail: mjenkins@maced.org.
Final Thoughts
For any certification program to be adopted, there must be an economic
incentive to change. Unless the free market provides a premium for
certified wood, most landowners will find little incentive to obtain
certification. European consumers and markets are familiar with
wood certification. Studies have shown most American consumers are
not willing to pay a premium for "green" products. A least
one national chain is experimenting with selling certified wood
products, but is encountering an inadequate supply. Proposed certification
programs that count on buyers to purchase certified wood and thereby
justify their standards may have the Acart before the horse.
If private landowners are interested in green certification, programs
such as Green Tag ForestrySM, which fit in with existing assistance
programs and require the involvement of professional foresters,
appear most credible.
(Portions adapted from AWill Green Standards Determine the Future
of Forestry?@ by Loren R. Larson, Executive Director, Association
of Consulting Foresters of America.)
Seminars for Landowners
Forest landowners in western Maryland and the mid-Atlantic region
can learn more about forest and wildlife stewardship at two upcoming
seminars.
Western Maryland Landowner Workshop
Absentee and resident forest landowners in Western Maryland can
find answers to forest stewardship questions at a full-day workshop
in Garrett County, Saturday, August 22.
Morning classroom sessions at the Western Maryland 4-H Center,
Swanton, will focus on land taxes, landowner liability, income from
alternative opportunities, management for wildlife, Christmas tree
production, and timber sales. At the afternoon session at a nearby
private forest property, participants will learn how to work with
a private forest consultant and experience stewardship practices
such as forest and pine thinning, regeneration harvesting, forest
buffers, and estimating future value of trees.
Registration is $10/person or $16/couple and includes lunch and
reference materials. Make check payable to Garrett County EAC and
mail to Forest Landowner Workshop, Garrett County Cooperative Extension,
1916 Maryland Highway, Suite A, Mt. Lake Park, MD 21550, by August
14. For more information call 301-334-6960 or Branching Out.
Mid-Atlantic Forest Stewardship Seminar
The award-winning annual Mid-Atlantic Forest Stewardship Seminar,
Saturday, November 7, presents speakers on a wide variety of forest
and wildlife management topics.
Included in one-hour sessions are forestry tax facts and strategies,
woodland weed control, selling timber, forest reptiles and amphibians,
forest and upland songbirds, ruffed grouse and wild turkey, wildlife
management, alternative income opportunities, and women and the
outdoors. The keynote speech will be on Stream Releaf.
The seminar is at Frederick Community College. Registration of
$19 includes a full lunch. For information, contact Terry Poole,
Frederick County Cooperative Extension, 301-694-1594; tp8@umail.umd.edu.
Now is the time...
The coming months are a good time to check your forestland roads
and trails to be certain they are ready for fall and winter rains
and snow. How is the drainage? Does water soak in or drain off?
Are there wet pockets? Is the road/trail surface stable? If not,
you might consider planting a ground cover that also would benefit
wildlife, such as lespedeza or a pasture mix other than Kentucky
31.
Forest Health Update
Sycamore trees have shown symptoms of sycamore anthracnose fungus--young
leaves turning brown and dying--because of the cool, moist spring.
Although the trees look as if they are dying, most will survive
a one-time setback, according to the Maryland Department of Agriculture.
Dear Branching Out,
I do not know if you ever tried to harvest trees. I did in
the late 80=s and it was not a problem. I tried it again last year
and found many restrictions. These trees have been in the family
for fifty years, but after my experiences, I=m wondering who owns
them?
The state of Maryland has numerous programs that encourage
forest stewardship. Under these programs, many of us have planted
trees, nursed them along, and protected them from deer damage .
. . under the presumption that we were engaged in an agricultural
activity, much like a farmer planting corn or a homemaker planting
a garden. However, one discovers that, unlike harvesting other agricultural
crops, harvesting trees has many restrictions.
One must get a special permit; attest that he will not destroy
the forest and will maintain it for five years; show that roads,
skid trails, and slopes do not exceed a certain grade; verify that
a wetland or stream buffer will not be affected (never mind that
the neighbor=s cows walk across the stream every day, contributing
pollution in excess of what a logger ever could); submit the harvest
application for review by several governing bodies; and hold a preconstruction
meeting on the site with the logger and a county official.
Who owns my trees? P.C.L., Frederick County
Dear P.C.L.,
You are right: harvesting trees is not as simple as it was and
it takes more time and planning. Roads must be constructed to protect
water quality, and stream buffers and wetlands require best management
practices. While targeted to protect trees on development sites,
the Forest Conservation Act has added another step for forest stewards
who harvest timber, since the landowner must sign a legal document
agreeing to maintian the forest for five years. The number and variety
of agencies and regulations involved in this process are good reasons
why most forest owners should use a consultant forester to assure
the timber harvest is done properly. Thank you for writing. We are
checking into the problems you described and plan to devote the
next Branching Out to the many aspects of harvesting timber.
RESOURCES for Forest Landowners
New! Legal Aspects of Owning and Managing Woodlands,
by Thom McEvoy, extension forester and associate professor, University
of Vermont; 174 pages, $20 paperback, $45 hardcover, plus shipping;
Island Press, 800-828-1302; ipwest@igc.apc.org; www.islandpress.org.
New! The Land of the Living, by John Mash, retired
MD-DNR forester. Did you know that most of the 40,000 acres comprising
Green Ridge State Forest in Allegany County was cleared and planted
as the Alargest apple orchard in the universe?@ This well-researched
book on the history of Green Ridge Forest and eastern Allegany County,
Maryland focuses on the human and natural history. It covers the
land itself, its wild creatures, the history of the forest, and
the interesting human history. Great reading! Available in some
libraries or purchased for $52.45 plus $3 shipping from the Living
History Foundation of Allegany County, 218 Washington St., Cumberland,
MD 21502, 301-777-8678.
Many web pages on the Internet have information for forest landowners.
Search for Aforest stewardship and select from the thousands of
topics, including the Forest Stewardship Programs in Maryland and
Connecticut.
Branching Out - Vol. 6, No. 3, Summer 1998
Editors: Jonathan Kays, Vera
Mae Schultz, Pam Townsend
Published four times a year and distributed to forest landowners,
resource professionals, and other interested in forest stewardship.
Issues are posted online at www.naturalresources.umd.edu/BranchingOut.cfm.
To sign up for online updates, e-mail listserv@listserv.umd.edu.
In the body of the message, type SUB branchingout your name (ex: SUB
branchingout John Doe). For a hardcopy subscription ($10 per year
- make checks payable to University of Maryland) or to send news items,
e-mail cmason@umd.edu; call 301-432-2767x338;
or write
Branching Out
Maryland Cooperative Extension
18330 Keedysville Road
Keedysville, MD 21756-1104.
The sponsoring agencies' programs are open to all citizens without
regard to race, color, gender, disability, religion, age, sexual orientation,
marital or parental status, or national origin.